One of the debates that has recently resurfaced, as it does periodically, is on the tradition and training method called kata. Or poomse. Or forms. Or patterns. I was inspired by a relatively recent comment on a previous post here at TDA (Are Kata/Poomse Important?), and by Black Belt Mama's thoughts at her blog on the same subject (The Great Kata Debate). To summarize a few views out there (and here):
My (Nathan at TDA Training) views from Are Kata/Poomse Important?:
What forms are good for:
- Preservation of classical or "traditional" technique.
- An excellent workout.
- Teaching concentration and memorization.
- Demonstrates and preserves the beauty of the martial arts.
- Forms provide steady income for schools.
- Forms break up the monotony of training.
What they aren't good for:
- Kata techniques aren't used in self-defense.
- Kata performance is not an efficient means of preparing for sparring, fighting, or self-defense.
Bottom line: Kata aren't the most efficient way to prepare for unarmed combat, but are a great way to carry on the techniques of the past in your respective arts. I will continue to do them into the future because I love them, but I'll be training for battle in another way. [Please see the original post for full explanation of each bullet point]
Other Views:
"Being a martial artist that started learning kata during my very first karate class, it never even occurred to me that the martial arts could exist without kata. To me, it has always been the backbone of what I am learning; and as one of my instructor's calls it, "the vehicle" to greater understanding of technique. It's not just that either. Repetitive kata has the ultimate goal of the practitioner entering a state of mushin (mind no mind), which loosely translates into your mind being so free from thought that you just instinctively react to what's going on around you. Simply put, mushin means "don't think."" - Black Belt Mama, The Great Kata Debate
A great point, and one which I don't cover, but experience almost exclusively through kata.
"Employing true martial waza during sparring is definitely not socially responsible behavior. So to maintain the original fire that a traditional art was forged in, we have kata. Kata, specifically bunkai, reminds us that the martial arts are of a very serious nature. When Okinawans were denied the right to bear arms at various times throughout their violent history (including the US military occupation following the second World War), the practice of kata became a stealthy option. Karate's earliest training sessions were shrouded in secrecy, and often took place after dark. So it should come as no surprise that kata was created, in part, to conceal its real purpose." - John Vesia, Breaking The Kata Code
First of all, how do BBM and John come up with those great post titles! Man, if only I could hire them at TDA! My response is that John is correct: sparring cannot include the more serious and deadly techniques of any art - else we'd all be cripples or dead. But herein is the crux of my argument against kata as "the most efficient way" to prepare for fighting or self-defense - they're not! If it requires interpretation, there is a shortcut: just teach the application, but in a way that's truly applicable.
"I've been studying martial arts for about 6 years now, and I felt the way you seem to about forms (their combat applications being useless) until a few months ago. I'm currently studying at a Matsubayashi-Ryu School that emphasizes bunkai for Kata (applications) and links self-defense to Kata.
Now, you may think this is cheating, but you have to look at Kata as the tip of the iceberg of Karate. Each move is abstracted to be non-lethal, and to effectively 'hide' the true technique.
I don't want to keep talking forever about this, but a good book I would recommend is Gennosuke Higaki's (a pen name, not his real name) Hidden Karate.
Kata really are the encyclopedia of a martial art, and I bet if you looked hard enough (again, if you don't think viewing Kata as far removed abstractions of combat is cheating) you would see the combative moves you practice for self-defense 'hidden' in the Kata/Poomse/forms that already serve as valuable tools in your curriculum." - Dean Dieker, replying to Are Kata/Poomse Important?
To which, I replied, "... I respect your position, and think I understand it. I am coming to this point of view after many years (30+) as a student of martial arts, and over 20 years teaching them. It took years before I learned the application of forms, then years before I abandoned them as a form of training for application.
Here's a summary of my reasons:
I agree, that hidden within each pattern/poomse/kata are self-defense techniques. I just question whether 1) they are all valid in today's world, and 2) whether kata are the most efficient means to their instruction.
You have inspired me to post on this again. I will try to locate "Hidden Karate" as soon as possible.
Please understand that my opinion is no more or less valid than anyone else's, even my own students'. It's just my opinion. It (my opinion) has changed before, and will probably change again on this very subject."
John Vesia even posted to the same effect a few months ago: "Certain bunkai (traditional self defense applications) are either misunderstood in some schools, or require too much finesse or fine motor skills to pull off when the heat is on." Which reinforces my point. The skill required to use the technique can definitely be achieved, but is it the most efficient means to that end? I say, "no."
Will I change my mind? Hmmm. Who's to say, but I don't think so. I will always consider kata as the truest expression of Karate-do: grace, peace, violence, harmony, and coordination in action. Will I consider it the best means to teach how to defend one's self? Probably not.
For more information, please read:
"Why Kata Is Important" at FightingArts.com.
Many posts at Isshin Ryu Karate Bugei by Charles James